Compare / head-to-head
Amazon Nova PremiervsClaude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Both offer a 1M-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · 100%
Amazon · Anthropic
Amazon Nova Premier
Amazon · released 2025-04-30
textvision
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- 10K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 6 · 2 core
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · released 2026-04-16
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 5 only Amazon Nova Premier · 16 only Claude Opus 4.7| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Premier | Claude Opus 4.7 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 42.4% ↗ | 87.6% ↗ | -45.2 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Only Amazon Nova Premier reports · 5 | ||||
| MMLU | 87.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BFCL | 63.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CharXiv | 84.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MATH-500 | 82% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA with RAG | 86.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Claude Opus 4.7 reports · 16 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 94.2% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 95.8% ↗matharena ⚠ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | not reported | 46.9% ↗ | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1483.4 ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp | not reported | 79.8% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 31.7% ↗epoch | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 70.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | not reported | 54.7% ↗ | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | not reported | 82.8% ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 97.8% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 51.7% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | not reported | 80.5% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | not reported | 34.5% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | not reported | 64.3% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 83.5% ↗epoch | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | not reported | 66.1% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Amazon Nova Premier minus Claude Opus 4.7 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Amazon Nova Premier | Claude Opus 4.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 10K tokens | 128K tokens | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Input price / 1M | — | $5 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $25 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.5 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $30 | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 6 | 18 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Amazon Nova Premier vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Claude Opus 4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Amazon Nova Premier and Claude Opus 4.7 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.