Compare / head-to-head

Claude Fable 5vsGemini 3.5 Flash

Claude Fable 5 leads 24 of 26 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash is 5.7x cheaper per token. Gemini 3.5 Flash has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
24 – 2
Claude Fable 5 leads
Cheaper per token
Gemini 3.5 Flash
5.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.5 Flash
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Anthropic · Google
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · released 2026-06-09
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$10 ↗
Output /1M
$50 ↗
Cached /1M
$1
Scores
44 · 11 core
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google · released 2026-05-19
textvisionaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$1.5 ↗
Output /1M
$9 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
42 · 12 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 3.5 FlashΔEdge
Reported by both · 26
GPQA Diamond85.9% ↗epoch run92.8% ↗epoch run-6.9 ptGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Elo1504.3 ↗1477.4 ↗+26.9Claude Fable 5
APEX-Agents (Mercor)63.6% ↗27.5% ↗+36.1 ptClaude Fable 5
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)41% ↗epoch run50% ↗epoch run-9 ptGemini 3.5 Flash
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)69.9% ↗36.1% ↗+33.8 ptClaude Fable 5
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)39.5% ↗epoch run4.8% ↗epoch run+34.7 ptClaude Fable 5
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)90.2% ↗epoch run26.8% ↗epoch run+63.4 ptClaude Fable 5
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)87% ↗epoch run62.8% ↗epoch run+24.2 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)62.2% ↗49% ↗+13.2 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)86% ↗78.2% ↗+7.8 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)80.5% ↗64.9% ↗+15.6 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)75.8% ↗75.6% ↗+0.2 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)90.7% ↗84.6% ↗+6.1 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96% ↗88.2% ↗+7.8 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)89.7% ↗82% ↗+7.7 ptClaude Fable 5
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1308.8 ↗1284.4 ↗+24.4Claude Fable 5
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1625.3 ↗1499 ↗+126.3Claude Fable 5
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)52% ↗epoch run32% ↗epoch run+20 ptClaude Fable 5
OSWorld-Verified85% ↗78.4% ↗+6.6 ptClaude Fable 5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch run95.6% ↗epoch run+4.4 ptClaude Fable 5
SAGE (Vals AI)51.9% ↗49.9% ↗+2 ptClaude Fable 5
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)81.9% ↗76.7% ↗+5.2 ptClaude Fable 5
SimpleQA Verified70.7% ↗epoch run66.2% ↗epoch run+4.5 ptClaude Fable 5
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)41.4% ↗6.1% ↗+35.3 ptClaude Fable 5
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)5680.26 ↗5396.42 ↗+283.8Claude Fable 5
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)91.9% ↗62.6% ↗+29.3 ptClaude Fable 5
Only Claude Fable 5 reports · 18
SWE-bench Verified95% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench17.4% ↗not reported——
Blueprint-Bench 238.6% ↗not reported——
CursorBench72.9% ↗not reported——
FrontierCode (Diamond)29.3% ↗not reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)47% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)35.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GDP.pdf29.8% ↗not reported——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)76.5% ↗not reported——
Legal Agent Benchmark (Harvey's Held-Out Set)13.3% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0821 ↗not reported——
MirrorCode (Epoch AI run)63.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OfficeQA Pro57.9% ↗not reported——
OSWorld-Verified (XLANG)86% ↗not reported——
SWE-Bench Pro80% ↗not reported——
SWE-rebench 2026-05-15 to 2026-07-01 (Nebius)64.5% ↗not reported——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)39.7% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 2.184.3% ↗not reported——
Only Gemini 3.5 Flash reports · 10
AIME 2026not reported95% ↗matharena ⚠——
ARC-AGI-2not reported72.1% ↗——
GDPVal-AAnot reported1656 ↗——
Humanity's Last Exam (full set, text + MM)not reported40.2% ↗——
MCP Atlasnot reported83.6% ↗——
MMMU-Pronot reported83.6% ↗——
SWE-Bench Pro (Public)not reported55.1% ↗——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)not reported79.3% ↗epoch run——
Terminal-bench 2.1not reported76.2% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)not reported67.3% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Fable 5 minus Gemini 3.5 Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Fable 5Gemini 3.5 FlashEdge
Context window1M tokens1.0M tokensGemini 3.5 Flash
Max output128K tokens66K tokensClaude Fable 5
Input price / 1M$10 ↗$1.5 ↗Gemini 3.5 Flash
Output price / 1M$50 ↗$9 ↗Gemini 3.5 Flash
Cached input / 1M$1 ↗$0.15 ↗Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$60$10.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · audioGemini 3.5 Flash
Released2026-06-092026-05-19—
Cited benchmark scores4442—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Claude Fable 5 vs …

More matchups

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.