Compare / head-to-head

Claude Fable 5vsGemini 3.8 Flash

Claude Fable 5 leads 21 of 27 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.8 Flash is 13.3x cheaper per token. Gemini 3.8 Flash has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
21 – 6
Claude Fable 5 leads
Cheaper per token
Gemini 3.8 Flash
13.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.8 Flash
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Anthropic · Google
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · released 2026-06-09
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$10 ↗
Output /1M
$50 ↗
Cached /1M
$1
Scores
44 · 11 core
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google · released 2026-09-02
textvisionaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$0.75 ↗
Output /1M
$3.75 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.075
Scores
43 · 10 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 3.8 FlashΔEdge
Reported by both · 27
GPQA Diamond85.9% ↗epoch run95.3% ↗-9.4 ptGemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Elo1504.3 ↗1494.8 ↗+9.5Claude Fable 5
APEX-Agents (Mercor)63.6% ↗64.3% ↗-0.7 ptGemini 3.8 Flash
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)41% ↗epoch run61% ↗epoch run-20 ptGemini 3.8 Flash
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)69.9% ↗73.8% ↗-3.9 ptGemini 3.8 Flash
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)90.2% ↗epoch run22% ↗epoch run+68.2 ptClaude Fable 5
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)87% ↗epoch run68.4% ↗epoch run+18.6 ptClaude Fable 5
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)47% ↗19.6% ↗+27.4 ptClaude Fable 5
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)35.8% ↗epoch run31.7% ↗epoch run+4.1 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)62.2% ↗54.2% ↗+8 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)86% ↗72.5% ↗+13.5 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)80.5% ↗54% ↗+26.5 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)75.8% ↗81.4% ↗-5.6 ptGemini 3.8 Flash
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)90.7% ↗87.8% ↗+2.9 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96% ↗91.6% ↗+4.4 ptClaude Fable 5
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)89.7% ↗89.3% ↗+0.4 ptClaude Fable 5
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0821 ↗0.0297 ↗+0.1Claude Fable 5
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1308.8 ↗1290.3 ↗+18.5Claude Fable 5
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1625.3 ↗1582.7 ↗+42.6Claude Fable 5
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)52% ↗epoch run47% ↗epoch run+5 ptClaude Fable 5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch run98.9% ↗epoch run+1.1 ptClaude Fable 5
SAGE (Vals AI)51.9% ↗35.1% ↗+16.8 ptClaude Fable 5
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)81.9% ↗82.4% ↗-0.5 ptGemini 3.8 Flash
SimpleQA Verified70.7% ↗epoch run69.7% ↗epoch run+1 ptClaude Fable 5
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)41.4% ↗19.2% ↗+22.2 ptClaude Fable 5
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)5680.26 ↗5093.79 ↗+586.5Claude Fable 5
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)91.9% ↗84.8% ↗+7.1 ptClaude Fable 5
Only Claude Fable 5 reports · 17
SWE-bench Verified95% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench17.4% ↗not reported——
Blueprint-Bench 238.6% ↗not reported——
CursorBench72.9% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)39.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierCode (Diamond)29.3% ↗not reported——
GDP.pdf29.8% ↗not reported——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)76.5% ↗not reported——
Legal Agent Benchmark (Harvey's Held-Out Set)13.3% ↗not reported——
MirrorCode (Epoch AI run)63.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OfficeQA Pro57.9% ↗not reported——
OSWorld-Verified85% ↗not reported——
OSWorld-Verified (XLANG)86% ↗not reported——
SWE-Bench Pro80% ↗not reported——
SWE-rebench 2026-05-15 to 2026-07-01 (Nebius)64.5% ↗not reported——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)39.7% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 2.184.3% ↗not reported——
Only Gemini 3.8 Flash reports · 10
CharXiv Reasoning (no tools)not reported86.2% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported73.7% ↗——
GDPVal-AA v2not reported1545 ↗——
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmarknot reported10% ↗——
HLE-Verifiednot reported54.9% ↗——
LABBench2not reported86.2% ↗——
OSWorld-2.0not reported59% ↗——
Terminal-bench 2.1not reported89.4% ↗——
Terminal-bench 4.0not reported19.1% ↗——
Vals Finance Agent v2not reported61.4% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Fable 5 minus Gemini 3.8 Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Fable 5Gemini 3.8 FlashEdge
Context window1M tokens1.0M tokensGemini 3.8 Flash
Max output128K tokens66K tokensClaude Fable 5
Input price / 1M$10 ↗$0.75 ↗Gemini 3.8 Flash
Output price / 1M$50 ↗$3.75 ↗Gemini 3.8 Flash
Cached input / 1M$1 ↗$0.075 ↗Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$60$4.5Gemini 3.8 Flash
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · audioGemini 3.8 Flash
Released2026-06-092026-09-02—
Cited benchmark scores4443—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Claude Fable 5 vs …

More matchups

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.