Compare / head-to-head
Claude Haiku 4.5vsLlama 4 Maverick
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Llama 4 Maverick
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Anthropic · Meta
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · released 2025-10-15
textvision
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta · released 2025-04-05
textvision
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 2 · 2 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 3 only Claude Haiku 4.5 · 1 only Llama 4 Maverick| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Llama 4 Maverick | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% ↗epoch | 69.8% ↗ | +1.4 pt | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Only Claude Haiku 4.5 reports · 3 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 66.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only Llama 4 Maverick reports · 1 | ||||
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 80.5% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Haiku 4.5 minus Llama 4 Maverick in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Llama 4 Maverick | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1M tokens | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Max output | 64K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $1 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $5 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.1 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $6 | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2025-04-05 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 4 | 2 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Llama 4 Maverick vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 4 Maverick on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.