Compare / head-to-head
Claude Opus 4.1vsGPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. GPT-5.6 Luna is 64.3x cheaper per token. GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 4
GPT-5.6 Luna leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-5.6 Luna
64.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.6 Luna
1.1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 95.122%
Anthropic · OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic · released 2025-08-05
textvision
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI · released 2026-07-09
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
4 shared · 2 only Claude Opus 4.1 · 3 only GPT-5.6 Luna| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 4 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3% ↗epoch | 92.3% ↗ | -15 pt | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 2.4% ↗epoch | 61% ↗epoch | -58.6 pt | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 12.6% ↗epoch | 82.1% ↗epoch | -69.5 pt | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 68.9% ↗epoch | 98.3% ↗epoch | -29.4 pt | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Only Claude Opus 4.1 reports · 2 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 73.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5.6 Luna reports · 3 | ||||
| DeepSWE v1.1 | not reported | 67.2% ↗ | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 41% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | not reported | 62.7% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4.1 minus GPT-5.6 Luna in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.1M tokens | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Max output | 32K tokens | 128K tokens | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Input price / 1M | $15 ↗ | $0.2 ↗ | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Output price / 1M | $75 ↗ | $1.2 ↗ | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Cached input / 1M | $1.5 ↗ | $0.02 ↗ | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $90 | $1.4 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | 2026-07-09 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 6 | 8 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Opus 4.1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.6 Luna vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.6 Luna on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.