Compare / head-to-head
Claude Opus 4.7vsGemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 leads 8 of 8 shared benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro is 2.7x cheaper per token. Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
8 – 0
Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Cheaper per token
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 2.5 Pro
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 100%
Anthropic · Google
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · released 2026-04-16
textvision
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google · released 2025-06-17
textvisionaudio
Quality
Benchmark matrix
8 shared · 9 only Claude Opus 4.7 · 4 only Gemini 2.5 Pro| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 8 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% ↗ | 59.6% ↗ | +28 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.2% ↗ | 86.4% ↗ | +7.8 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 46.9% ↗ | 21.6% ↗ | +25.3 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| LMArena Elo | 1483.4 ↗ | 1457.8 ↗ | +25.6 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 31.7% ↗epoch | 0% ↗epoch | +31.7 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 70.2% ↗epoch | 24.6% ↗epoch | +45.6 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 97.8% ↗epoch | 84.7% ↗epoch | +13.1 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 83.5% ↗epoch | 57.6% ↗epoch | +25.9 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Only Claude Opus 4.7 reports · 9 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | 95.8% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp | 79.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 54.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 82.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 80.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | 34.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 64.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 66.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Gemini 2.5 Pro reports · 4 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 88% ↗ | — | — |
| Aider Polyglot | not reported | 82.2% ↗ | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | not reported | 74.2% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMU | not reported | 82% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4.7 minus Gemini 2.5 Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.0M tokens | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 66K tokens | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Input price / 1M | $5 ↗ | $1.25 ↗ | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Output price / 1M | $25 ↗ | $10 ↗ | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | $0.125 ↗ | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $30 | $11.25 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision · audio | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2025-06-17 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 18 | 14 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Opus 4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.