Compare / head-to-head
Claude Opus 4.7vsGLM-4.6
Claude Opus 4.7 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. GLM-4.6 is 10.7x cheaper per token. Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Cheaper per token
GLM-4.6
10.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Claude Opus 4.7
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Anthropic · Z.ai
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · released 2026-04-16
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 16 only Claude Opus 4.7 · 1 only GLM-4.6| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.6 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1483.4 ↗ | 1440.5 ↗ | +42.9 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Only Claude Opus 4.7 reports · 16 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | 95.8% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 46.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp | 79.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 31.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 70.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 54.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 82.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 97.8% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 80.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | 34.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 64.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 83.5% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 66.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GLM-4.6 reports · 1 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 91.7% ↗matharena ⚠ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4.7 minus GLM-4.6 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM-4.6 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 200K tokens | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131K tokens | GLM-4.6 |
| Input price / 1M | $5 ↗ | $0.6 ↗ | GLM-4.6 |
| Output price / 1M | $25 ↗ | $2.2 ↗ | GLM-4.6 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | $0.11 ↗ | GLM-4.6 |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $30 | $2.8 | GLM-4.6 |
| Modalities | text · vision | text | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | — | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 18 | 2 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Opus 4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GLM-4.6 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-4.6 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.