Compare / head-to-head
Claude Opus 4.7vsQwen3.8-Flash
Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.8-Flash do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Qwen3.8-Flash is 60.6x cheaper per token. Both offer a 1M-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.8-Flash
60.6x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Anthropic · Qwen
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · released 2026-04-16
textvision
Qwen3.8-Flash
Qwen · released 2026-08-26
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 17 only Claude Opus 4.7 · 0 only Qwen3.8-Flash| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Qwen3.8-Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Claude Opus 4.7 reports · 17 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | 95.8% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 46.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | 1483.4 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp | 79.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 31.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 70.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 54.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 82.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 97.8% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 80.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | 34.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 64.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 83.5% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 66.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.8-Flash reports · 0 | ||||
| Qwen3.8-Flash reports nothing Claude Opus 4.7 does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4.7 minus Qwen3.8-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Qwen3.8-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131K tokens | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Input price / 1M | $5 ↗ | $0.113 ↗ | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Output price / 1M | $25 ↗ | $0.382 ↗ | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $30 | $0.495 | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2026-08-26 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 18 | 0 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Opus 4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.8-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.