Compare / head-to-head
Claude Opus 4.8vs
Inkling-Small
Claude Opus 4.8 leads 16 of 16 shared benchmarks. Inkling-Small is 20x cheaper per token. Both offer a 1M-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
16 – 0
Claude Opus 4.8 leads
Cheaper per token
Inkling-Small
20x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Anthropic · Thinking Machines Lab
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · released 2026-05-28
textvision
Inkling-Small
Thinking Machines Lab · released 2026-07-30
textvisionaudio
Quality
Benchmark matrix
16 shared · 24 only Claude Opus 4.8 · 12 only Inkling-Small| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.8 | Inkling-Small | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 16 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 88.6% ↗ | 80.2% ↗ | +8.4 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| GPQA Diamond | 93.6% ↗ | 88.5% ↗epoch run | +5.1 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| AIME 2026 | 100% ↗matharena ⚠ | 95.5% ↗ | +4.5 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| LMArena Elo | 1452.7 ↗ | 1405.2 ↗ | +47.5 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run) | 34% ↗epoch run | 18% ↗epoch run | +16 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 56.1% ↗epoch run | 17.1% ↗epoch run | +39 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 80% ↗epoch run | 46.3% ↗epoch run | +33.7 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| LMArena Agent (LMArena) | 0.0664 ↗ | -0.1033 ↗ | +0.2 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| LMArena Vision (LMArena) | 1286.4 ↗ | 1206.3 ↗ | +80.1 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| LMArena WebDev (LMArena) | 1555.5 ↗ | 1408.2 ↗ | +147.3 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run) | 36% ↗epoch run | 6% ↗epoch run | +30 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 98.3% ↗epoch run | 90% ↗epoch run | +8.3 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 54.8% ↗ | 32.7% ↗ | +22.1 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 53% ↗epoch run | 20.6% ↗ | +32.4 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI) | 23.2% ↗ | 0% ↗ | +23.2 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST) | 76.2% ↗ | 54.4% ↗ | +21.8 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Only Claude Opus 4.8 reports · 24 | ||||
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 49.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| APEX-Agents (Mercor) | 48.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp | 84.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve) | 59% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| EBR-bench (Epoch AI run) | 28.6% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run) | 42.5% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| GSO Opt@1 (GSO) | 47.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 57.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench) | 50.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Coding (LiveBench) | 81.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench) | 66% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench) | 72% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Language (LiveBench) | 79.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench) | 94.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench) | 89.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 83.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleBench (SimpleBench) | 64.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 84.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | 38.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 69.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra) | 39.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 74.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs) | 5787.43 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle) | 82.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Inkling-Small reports · 12 | ||||
| ARC-AGI-1 | not reported | 84% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | not reported | 40.1% ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp (with context management) | not reported | 77.4% ↗ | — | — |
| CharXiv RQ | not reported | 77.4% ↗ | — | — |
| CharXiv RQ (with python) | not reported | 81.3% ↗ | — | — |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | not reported | 90.2% ↗ | — | — |
| IFBench | not reported | 82.2% ↗ | — | — |
| MCP Atlas (all) | not reported | 79.2% ↗ | — | — |
| MMAU | not reported | 77% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro (public) | not reported | 55.9% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (best harness) | not reported | 64.7% ↗ | — | — |
| Toolathlon Verified | not reported | 54.4% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4.8 minus Inkling-Small in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Opus 4.8 | Inkling-Small | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 128K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $5 ↗ | $0.3 ↗ | Inkling-Small |
| Output price / 1M | $25 ↗ | $1.2 ↗ | Inkling-Small |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | $0.06 ↗ | Inkling-Small |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $30 | $1.5 | Inkling-Small |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision · audio | Inkling-Small |
| Released | 2026-05-28 | 2026-07-30 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 47 | 29 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Live from /statusMore matchups
Claude Opus 4.8 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Inkling-Small vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling-Small on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.