Compare / head-to-head
Claude Opus 4.8vsQwen3.5 27B
Claude Opus 4.8 leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.5 27B is 38.8x cheaper per token. Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
4 – 0
Claude Opus 4.8 leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.5 27B
38.8x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Claude Opus 4.8
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Anthropic · Qwen
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · released 2026-05-28
textvision
Qwen3.5 27B
Qwen
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
4 shared · 12 only Claude Opus 4.8 · 1 only Qwen3.5 27B| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.8 | Qwen3.5 27B | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 4 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 88.6% ↗ | 75% ↗ | +13.6 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| GPQA Diamond | 93.6% ↗ | 85.5% ↗ | +8.1 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| AIME 2026 | 100% ↗matharena ⚠ | 91.7% ↗matharena ⚠ | +8.3 pt | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| LMArena Elo | 1452.7 ↗ | 1408.1 ↗ | +44.6 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Only Claude Opus 4.8 reports · 12 | ||||
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 49.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp | 84.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 56.1% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 80% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 57.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 83.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 98.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 53% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 84.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | 38.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 69.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 74.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.5 27B reports · 1 | ||||
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 86.1% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4.8 minus Qwen3.5 27B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Opus 4.8 | Qwen3.5 27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 262K tokens | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Max output | 128K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $5 ↗ | $0.086 ↗ | Qwen3.5 27B |
| Output price / 1M | $25 ↗ | $0.688 ↗ | Qwen3.5 27B |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $30 | $0.774 | Qwen3.5 27B |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-05-28 | — | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 17 | 5 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Opus 4.8 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.5 27B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3.5 27B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.