ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Claude Opus 4.8vsStep 3.5 Flash

Claude Opus 4.8 leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window (1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
4 – 0
Claude Opus 4.8 leads
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
Claude Opus 4.8
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Anthropic · StepFun
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · released 2026-05-28
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$5
Output /1M
$25
Cached /1M
$0.5
Scores
17 · 13 core
Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun · released 2026-02-12
text
Context
256K
Max out
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
18 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Step 3.5 FlashΔEdge
Reported by both · 4
SWE-bench Verified88.6% 74.4% +14.2 ptClaude Opus 4.8
AIME 2026100% matharena96.7% matharena+3.3 ptClaude Opus 4.8
LMArena Elo1452.7 1403.7 +49Claude Opus 4.8
BrowseComp84.3% 51.6% +32.7 ptClaude Opus 4.8
Only Claude Opus 4.8 reports · 12
GPQA Diamond93.6% not reported
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)49.8% not reported
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)56.1% epochnot reported
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)80% epochnot reported
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)57.9% not reported
OSWorld-Verified83.4% not reported
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.3% epochnot reported
SimpleQA Verified53% epochnot reported
SWE-bench Multilingual84.4% not reported
SWE-bench Multimodal38.4% not reported
SWE-Bench Pro69.2% not reported
Terminal-Bench 2.174.6% not reported
Only Step 3.5 Flash reports · 13
AIME 2025not reported97.3%
BrowseComp (with context manager)not reported69%
BrowseComp-ZHnot reported66.9%
BrowseComp-ZH (with context manager)not reported73.7%
GAIA (no file)not reported84.5%
HMMT 2025 (Feb/Nov average)not reported96.2%
IMOAnswerBenchnot reported85.4%
LiveCodeBench v6not reported86.4%
ResearchRubricsnot reported65.3%
Tau2-Benchnot reported88.2%
Terminal-Bench 2.0not reported51%
xbench-DeepSearch 2025.05not reported83.7%
xbench-DeepSearch 2025.10not reported56.3%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4.8 minus Step 3.5 Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.8Step 3.5 FlashEdge
Context window1M tokens256K tokensClaude Opus 4.8
Max output128K tokens
Input price / 1M$5
Output price / 1M$25
Cached input / 1M$0.5
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$30
Modalitiestext · visiontextClaude Opus 4.8
Released2026-05-282026-02-12
Cited benchmark scores1718
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

Claude Opus 4.8 vs …

More matchups

Step 3.5 Flash vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4.8 and Step 3.5 Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.