Compare / head-to-head
Claude Opus 5vsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Claude Opus 5 leads 3 of 5 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 2.1x cheaper per token. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
3 – 2
Claude Opus 5 leads
Cheaper per token
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
2.1x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 100%
Anthropic · Google
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic · released 2026-07-24
textvision
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google · released 2026-02-19
textvisionaudio
Quality
Benchmark matrix
5 shared · 4 only Claude Opus 5 · 4 only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 5 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% ↗epoch | 94.3% ↗ | -0.4 pt | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 73.2% ↗epoch | 26.8% ↗epoch | +46.4 pt | Claude Opus 5 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 85.6% ↗epoch | 59.6% ↗epoch | +26 pt | Claude Opus 5 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 98.9% ↗epoch | 95.6% ↗epoch | +3.3 pt | Claude Opus 5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 59.9% ↗epoch | 73.5% ↗epoch | -13.6 pt | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Only Claude Opus 5 reports · 4 | ||||
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 56.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CursorBench 3.2.0 | 70% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval-AA v2 | 1824 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 | 29% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reports · 4 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 98.3% ↗matharena ⚠ | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1480.1 ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | not reported | 77.1% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | not reported | 54.2% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 5 minus Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.0M tokens | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 66K tokens | Claude Opus 5 |
| Input price / 1M | $5 ↗ | $2 ↗ | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Output price / 1M | $25 ↗ | $12 ↗ | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | $0.2 ↗ | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $30 | $14 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision · audio | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Released | 2026-07-24 | 2026-02-19 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 9 | 10 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Opus 5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.