Compare / head-to-head
Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGPT-4.1 nano
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. GPT-4.1 nano is 36x cheaper per token. GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-4.1 nano
36x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-4.1 nano
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 94.2446%
Anthropic · OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic · released 2025-09-29
textvision
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI · released 2025-04-14
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 17 only Claude Sonnet 4.5 · 3 only GPT-4.1 nano| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-4.1 nano | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 83.4% ↗ | 50.3% ↗ | +33.1 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 77.8% ↗epoch | 28.9% ↗epoch | +48.9 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.7% ↗epoch | 6% ↗epoch | +24.7 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 reports · 17 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | 84.2% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 17.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | 13.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 2.4% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 23.9% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1276 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 33.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MCP Atlas | 43.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMLU | 89.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (no tools) | 63.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (with tools) | 68.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 61.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 71.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-bench Retail | 86.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-bench Telecom | 98% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 51% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-4.1 nano reports · 3 | ||||
| MMLU | not reported | 80.1% ↗ | — | — |
| Aider Polyglot | not reported | 9.8% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2024 | not reported | 29.4% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Sonnet 4.5 minus GPT-4.1 nano in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-4.1 nano | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.0M tokens | GPT-4.1 nano |
| Max output | 64K tokens | 33K tokens | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Input price / 1M | $3 ↗ | $0.1 ↗ | GPT-4.1 nano |
| Output price / 1M | $15 ↗ | $0.4 ↗ | GPT-4.1 nano |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.3 ↗ | $0.025 ↗ | GPT-4.1 nano |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $18 | $0.5 | GPT-4.1 nano |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-09-29 | 2025-04-14 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 21 | 7 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-4.1 nano vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-4.1 nano on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.