Compare / head-to-head

Claude Sonnet 5.5vsGrok 4.1 Fast Reasoning

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning is 17.1x cheaper per token. Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning has the larger context window (2M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
4 – 0
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Cheaper per token
Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
17.1x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
2M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Anthropic · xAI
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic · released 2026-09-28
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.2
Scores
29 · 10 core
Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
xAI · released 2025-11-19
text
Context
2M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.2 ↗
Output /1M
$0.5 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.05
Scores
7 · 3 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1 Fast ReasoningΔEdge
Reported by both · 4
LMArena Elo1471 ↗1430.3 ↗+40.7Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1268.3 ↗1196.3 ↗+72Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1786.3 ↗1241.3 ↗+545Claude Sonnet 5.5
SAGE (Vals AI)51.8% ↗31.3% ↗+20.5 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 reports · 25
GPQA Diamond95.6% ↗epoch runnot reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)75.5% ↗not reported——
Chartography (no tools)61.6% ↗not reported——
CursorBench 4.055.5% ↗not reported——
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)46.2% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)80.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)88.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)61.9% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)75% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)64.5% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)56.3% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)91.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)78.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)70.5% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)83.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)91.6% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1252 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)65% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OSWorld 2.1 (partial)80.1% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)75.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified46.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.070.6% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)64.1% ↗not reported——
Only Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning reports · 3
FRAMES (Agent Tools API)not reported87.6% ↗——
Research-Eval Reka (Agent Tools API)not reported63.9% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported1106.63 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Sonnet 5.5 minus Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1 Fast ReasoningEdge
Context window1M tokens2M tokensGrok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.2 ↗Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$0.5 ↗Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
Cached input / 1M$0.2 ↗$0.05 ↗Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$0.7Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
Modalitiestext · visiontextClaude Sonnet 5.5
Released2026-09-282025-11-19—
Cited benchmark scores297—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs …

More matchups

Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.