Compare / head-to-head

Claude Sonnet 5.5vsQwen3.8-Max

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 18 of 22 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8-Max is 1.5x cheaper per token. Both offer a 1M-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
18 – 4
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.8-Max
1.5x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Anthropic · Qwen
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic · released 2026-09-28
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.2
Scores
29 · 10 core
Qwen3.8-Max
Qwen · released 2026-08-02
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$6 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
34 · 10 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3.8-MaxΔEdge
Reported by both · 22
GPQA Diamond95.6% ↗epoch run92.6% ↗+3 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena Elo1471 ↗1480.6 ↗-9.6Qwen3.8-Max
APEX-Agents (Mercor)75.5% ↗63.3% ↗+12.2 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)80.5% ↗epoch run46.3% ↗epoch run+34.2 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)88.8% ↗epoch run74.7% ↗epoch run+14.1 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)61.9% ↗17.8% ↗+44.1 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)75% ↗epoch run20% ↗epoch run+55 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)56.3% ↗64.6% ↗-8.3 ptQwen3.8-Max
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)91.4% ↗72.9% ↗+18.5 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)78.6% ↗78.4% ↗+0.2 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)70.5% ↗74.1% ↗-3.6 ptQwen3.8-Max
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)83.4% ↗79.7% ↗+3.7 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.7% ↗91.3% ↗+5.4 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)91.6% ↗88.2% ↗+3.4 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1252 ↗0.0251 ↗+0.1Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1268.3 ↗1301.2 ↗-32.9Qwen3.8-Max
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1786.3 ↗1671.2 ↗+115.1Claude Sonnet 5.5
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)65% ↗epoch run38% ↗epoch run+27 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch run99.4% ↗epoch run+0.6 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
SAGE (Vals AI)51.8% ↗51.3% ↗+0.5 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
SimpleQA Verified46.5% ↗epoch run45.8% ↗epoch run+0.7 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)64.1% ↗34.3% ↗+29.8 ptClaude Sonnet 5.5
Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 reports · 7
Chartography (no tools)61.6% ↗not reported——
CursorBench 4.055.5% ↗not reported——
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)46.2% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)64.5% ↗not reported——
OSWorld 2.1 (partial)80.1% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)75.9% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.070.6% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3.8-Max reports · 5
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported40% ↗epoch run——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)not reported57.5% ↗——
SWE-Bench Pronot reported67.7% ↗——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)not reported55.2% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported86.6% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Sonnet 5.5 minus Qwen3.8-Max in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3.8-MaxEdge
Context window1M tokens1M tokensTie
Max output128K tokens131K tokensQwen3.8-Max
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$2 ↗Tie
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$6 ↗Qwen3.8-Max
Cached input / 1M$0.2 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$8Qwen3.8-Max
Modalitiestext · visiontext · visionTie
Released2026-09-282026-08-02—
Cited benchmark scores2934—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.8-Max on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.