ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Command A VisionvsERNIE 5.1

Command A Vision and ERNIE 5.1 do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Both offer a 128K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 128K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · Baidu
Command A Vision
Cohere · released 2025-07-31
textvision
Context
128K
Max out
8K
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
0 · 0 core
ERNIE 5.1
Baidu · released 2026-05-09
text
Context
128K
Max out
66K
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
2 · 2 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkCommand A VisionERNIE 5.1ΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only Command A Vision reports · 0
Command A Vision reports nothing ERNIE 5.1 does not.
Only ERNIE 5.1 reports · 2
LMArena Elonot reported1468.2
AIME 2026 (with tools)not reported99.6%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command A Vision minus ERNIE 5.1 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecCommand A VisionERNIE 5.1Edge
Context window128K tokens128K tokensTie
Max output8K tokens66K tokensERNIE 5.1
Input price / 1M
Output price / 1M
Cached input / 1M
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
Modalitiestext · visiontextCommand A Vision
Released2025-07-312026-05-09
Cited benchmark scores02
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

ERNIE 5.1 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command A Vision and ERNIE 5.1 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.