Compare / head-to-head
Command A VisionvsGemini 3.6 Flash
Command A Vision and Gemini 3.6 Flash do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.6 Flash
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 100%
Cohere · Google
Command A Vision
Cohere · released 2025-07-31
textvision
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 8K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 0 · 0 core
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google · released 2026-07-21
textvisionaudio
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 0 only Command A Vision · 14 only Gemini 3.6 Flash| Benchmark | Command A Vision | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Command A Vision reports · 0 | ||||
| Command A Vision reports nothing Gemini 3.6 Flash does not. | ||||
| Only Gemini 3.6 Flash reports · 14 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 94.1% ↗epoch | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 96.7% ↗matharena ⚠ | — | — |
| CharXiv Reasoning (no tools) | not reported | 85.2% ↗ | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | not reported | 49% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 22% ↗epoch | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 58.9% ↗epoch | — | — |
| GDM-MRCR v2 (128k average) | not reported | 91.8% ↗ | — | — |
| GDPVal-AA v2 | not reported | 1421 ↗ | — | — |
| MLE-Bench | not reported | 63.9% ↗ | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | not reported | 83% ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 94.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 66.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro (Public) | not reported | 58.7% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-bench 2.1 | not reported | 78% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command A Vision minus Gemini 3.6 Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command A Vision | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1.0M tokens | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Max output | 8K tokens | 66K tokens | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Input price / 1M | — | $0.75 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $3.75 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.075 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $4.5 | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision · audio | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Released | 2025-07-31 | 2026-07-21 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 0 | 14 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command A Vision and Gemini 3.6 Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.