Compare / head-to-head
Command A VisionvsLongCat Flash Chat
Command A Vision and LongCat Flash Chat do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Both offer a 128K-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 128K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · Meituan LongCat
Command A Vision
Cohere · released 2025-07-31
textvision
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 8K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 0 · 0 core
LongCat Flash Chat
Meituan LongCat · released 2025-09-01
text
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 31 · 9 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 0 only Command A Vision · 31 only LongCat Flash Chat| Benchmark | Command A Vision | LongCat Flash Chat | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Command A Vision reports · 0 | ||||
| Command A Vision reports nothing LongCat Flash Chat does not. | ||||
| Only LongCat Flash Chat reports · 31 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 60.4% ↗ | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 73.23% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU | not reported | 89.71% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 82.68% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 61.25% ↗ | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1422.9 ↗ | — | — |
| AceBench | not reported | 76.1% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2024 | not reported | 70.42% ↗ | — | — |
| ArenaHard-V2 | not reported | 86.5% ↗ | — | — |
| BeyondAIME | not reported | 43% ↗ | — | — |
| C-Eval | not reported | 90.44% ↗ | — | — |
| CMMLU | not reported | 84.34% ↗ | — | — |
| COLLIE | not reported | 57.1% ↗ | — | — |
| DROP | not reported | 79.06% ↗ | — | — |
| GraphWalks-128k | not reported | 51.05% ↗ | — | — |
| HumanEval+ | not reported | 88.41% ↗ | — | — |
| IFEval | not reported | 89.65% ↗ | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | not reported | 48.02% ↗ | — | — |
| MATH500 | not reported | 96.4% ↗ | — | — |
| MBPP+ | not reported | 79.63% ↗ | — | — |
| Meeseeks-zh | not reported | 43.03% ↗ | — | — |
| Safety: Criminal | not reported | 91.24% ↗ | — | — |
| Safety: Harmful | not reported | 83.98% ↗ | — | — |
| Safety: Misinformation | not reported | 81.72% ↗ | — | — |
| Safety: Privacy | not reported | 93.98% ↗ | — | — |
| Tau2-Bench (airline) | not reported | 58% ↗ | — | — |
| Tau2-Bench (retail) | not reported | 71.27% ↗ | — | — |
| Tau2-Bench (telecom) | not reported | 73.68% ↗ | — | — |
| TerminalBench | not reported | 39.51% ↗ | — | — |
| VitaBench | not reported | 24.3% ↗ | — | — |
| ZebraLogic | not reported | 89.3% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command A Vision minus LongCat Flash Chat in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command A Vision | LongCat Flash Chat | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 128K tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 8K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text | Command A Vision |
| Released | 2025-07-31 | 2025-09-01 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 0 | 31 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
LongCat Flash Chat vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command A Vision and LongCat Flash Chat on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.