Compare / head-to-head
Command RvsGLM-4.7-FlashX
Command R and GLM-4.7-FlashX do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. GLM-4.7-FlashX is 1.6x cheaper per token. GLM-4.7-FlashX has the larger context window (200K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
GLM-4.7-FlashX
1.6x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GLM-4.7-FlashX
200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · Z.ai
Command R
Cohere · released 2024-08-30
text
GLM-4.7-FlashX
Z.ai
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 1 only Command R · 0 only GLM-4.7-FlashX| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.7-FlashX | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Command R reports · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1163 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GLM-4.7-FlashX reports · 0 | ||||
| GLM-4.7-FlashX reports nothing Command R does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R minus GLM-4.7-FlashX in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command R | GLM-4.7-FlashX | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 200K tokens | GLM-4.7-FlashX |
| Max output | 4K tokens | 131K tokens | GLM-4.7-FlashX |
| Input price / 1M | $0.15 ↗ | $0.07 ↗ | GLM-4.7-FlashX |
| Output price / 1M | $0.6 ↗ | $0.4 ↗ | GLM-4.7-FlashX |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.01 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $0.75 | $0.47 | GLM-4.7-FlashX |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 1 | 0 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Command R vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R and GLM-4.7-FlashX on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.