Compare / head-to-head
Command R7BvsGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Command R7B and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Command R7B is 2.7x cheaper per token. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Command R7B
2.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 100%
Cohere · Google
Command R7B
Cohere · released 2024-12-16
text
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Google · released 2025-07-22
textvisionaudio
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 7 only Command R7B · 4 only Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite| Benchmark | Command R7B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Command R7B reports · 7 | ||||
| MMLU | 65.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 42.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BFCL Overall | 52.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GPQA | 26.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IFEval | 77.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MBPP+ | 72% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| RepoQA | 69.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite reports · 4 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 27.6% ↗ | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 66.7% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 63.1% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | not reported | 6.9% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R7B minus Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command R7B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1.0M tokens | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
| Max output | 4K tokens | 66K tokens | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
| Input price / 1M | $0.038 ↗ | $0.1 ↗ | Command R7B |
| Output price / 1M | $0.15 ↗ | $0.4 ↗ | Command R7B |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.01 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $0.188 | $0.5 | Command R7B |
| Modalities | text | text · vision · audio | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
| Released | 2024-12-16 | 2025-07-22 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 7 | 4 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Command R7B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R7B and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.