Compare / head-to-head
Command R7BvsGLM-4.7
Command R7B and GLM-4.7 do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Command R7B is 14.9x cheaper per token. GLM-4.7 has the larger context window (200K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Command R7B
14.9x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GLM-4.7
200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · Z.ai
Command R7B
Cohere · released 2024-12-16
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 7 only Command R7B · 4 only GLM-4.7| Benchmark | Command R7B | GLM-4.7 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Command R7B reports · 7 | ||||
| MMLU | 65.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 42.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BFCL Overall | 52.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GPQA | 26.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IFEval | 77.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MBPP+ | 72% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| RepoQA | 69.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GLM-4.7 reports · 4 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 83.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1435.9 ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 83.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 32.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R7B minus GLM-4.7 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command R7B | GLM-4.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 200K tokens | GLM-4.7 |
| Max output | 4K tokens | 131K tokens | GLM-4.7 |
| Input price / 1M | $0.038 ↗ | $0.6 ↗ | Command R7B |
| Output price / 1M | $0.15 ↗ | $2.2 ↗ | Command R7B |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.11 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $0.188 | $2.8 | Command R7B |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2024-12-16 | 2025-12-22 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 7 | 4 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Command R7B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GLM-4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R7B and GLM-4.7 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.