ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Command R7BvsGLM-4.7-FlashX

Command R7B and GLM-4.7-FlashX do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Command R7B is 2.5x cheaper per token. GLM-4.7-FlashX has the larger context window (200K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Command R7B
2.5x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GLM-4.7-FlashX
200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · Z.ai
Command R7B
Cohere · released 2024-12-16
text
Context
128K
Max out
4K
Input /1M
$0.038
Output /1M
$0.15
Cached /1M
Scores
7 · 3 core
text
Context
200K
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0.07
Output /1M
$0.4
Cached /1M
$0.01
Scores
0 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkCommand R7BGLM-4.7-FlashXΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only Command R7B reports · 7
MMLU65.2% not reported
MMLU-Pro42.4% not reported
BFCL Overall52.2% not reported
GPQA26.3% not reported
IFEval77.9% not reported
MBPP+72% not reported
RepoQA69.6% not reported
Only GLM-4.7-FlashX reports · 0
GLM-4.7-FlashX reports nothing Command R7B does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R7B minus GLM-4.7-FlashX in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecCommand R7BGLM-4.7-FlashXEdge
Context window128K tokens200K tokensGLM-4.7-FlashX
Max output4K tokens131K tokensGLM-4.7-FlashX
Input price / 1M$0.038 $0.07 Command R7B
Output price / 1M$0.15 $0.4 Command R7B
Cached input / 1M$0.01
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.188$0.47Command R7B
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2024-12-16
Cited benchmark scores70
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

Command R7B vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R7B and GLM-4.7-FlashX on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.