Compare / head-to-head
Dola Seed 2.1 TurbovsGLM-4.7
Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo and GLM-4.7 do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. GLM-4.7 is 1.1x cheaper per token. Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo has the larger context window (256K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
GLM-4.7
1.1x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo
256K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
ByteDance Seed · Z.ai
Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo
ByteDance Seed · released 2026-07-13
textvisionvideo
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 26 only Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo · 4 only GLM-4.7| Benchmark | Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo | GLM-4.7 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo reports · 26 | ||||
| Agent Startup Bench | 54% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BabyVision | 62.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BeyondAIME | 88% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CharXiv-RQ | 82.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CharXiv-RQ (with tools) | 83.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ERQA | 71.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| KINA | 46.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MathVision | 90.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MathVision (with tools) | 92.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Minerva Video Reasoning | 65.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLongBench 128K | 76.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (with tools) | 82.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | 43.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OVOBench | 79.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SuperGPQA | 67.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Atlas | 30.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 67.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| TOMATO | 56.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| VideoMME | 89% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| VideoSimpleQA | 71.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Workspace Bench | 54.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| WorldVQA | 48.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| xDailyBench | 56.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ZEROBench | 11% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ZEROBench (with tools) | 20% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GLM-4.7 reports · 4 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 83.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1435.9 ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 83.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 32.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo minus GLM-4.7 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo | GLM-4.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 256K tokens | 200K tokens | Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo |
| Max output | — | 131K tokens | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | $0.6 ↗ | Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo |
| Output price / 1M | $2.5 ↗ | $2.2 ↗ | GLM-4.7 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.1 ↗ | $0.11 ↗ | Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $3 | $2.8 | GLM-4.7 |
| Modalities | text · vision · video | text | Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo |
| Released | 2026-07-13 | 2025-12-22 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 26 | 4 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GLM-4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo and GLM-4.7 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.