Compare / head-to-head
ERNIE 5.0vsGemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B leads 2 of 3 shared benchmarks. Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window (256K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 2
Gemma 4 31B leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Gemma 4 31B
256K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · 100%
Baidu · Google
ERNIE 5.0
Baidu · released 2026-02-06
textvision
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 66K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 21 · 5 core
Gemma 4 31B
Google · released 2026-04-02
textvision
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 6 · 5 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 18 only ERNIE 5.0 · 3 only Gemma 4 31B| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 | Gemma 4 31B | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 86.36% ↗ | 84.3% ↗ | +2.1 pt | ERNIE 5.0 |
| MMLU-Pro | 83.8% ↗ | 85.2% ↗ | -1.4 pt | Gemma 4 31B |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 76.21% ↗ | 80% ↗ | -3.8 pt | Gemma 4 31B |
| Only ERNIE 5.0 reports · 18 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | 89.06% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ACEBench Chinese | 89.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ACEBench English | 87.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BBEH | 66.63% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BFCL v4 | 66.47% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp-ZH | 64.71% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ChineseSimpleQA | 86.03% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HMMT 2025 | 79.58% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HumanEval+ | 94.48% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 25.81% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IFEval | 93.35% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MBPP+ | 82.54% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Multi-IF | 85.56% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MultiChallenge | 65.98% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA | 74.01% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SpreadsheetBench | 40.08% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-Bench | 78.79% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ZebraLogic | 96.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Gemma 4 31B reports · 3 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 89.2% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | not reported | 19.5% ↗ | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1441.7 ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is ERNIE 5.0 minus Gemma 4 31B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | ERNIE 5.0 | Gemma 4 31B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 256K tokens | Gemma 4 31B |
| Max output | 66K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-02-06 | 2026-04-02 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 21 | 6 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
ERNIE 5.0 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Gemma 4 31B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run ERNIE 5.0 and Gemma 4 31B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.