Compare / head-to-head
ERNIE 5.0vsQwen3.8-Flash
ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.8-Flash do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Qwen3.8-Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.8-Flash
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Baidu · Qwen
ERNIE 5.0
Baidu · released 2026-02-06
textvision
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 66K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 21 · 5 core
Qwen3.8-Flash
Qwen · released 2026-08-26
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 21 only ERNIE 5.0 · 0 only Qwen3.8-Flash| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 | Qwen3.8-Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only ERNIE 5.0 reports · 21 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 86.36% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 83.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | 89.06% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ACEBench Chinese | 89.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ACEBench English | 87.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BBEH | 66.63% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BFCL v4 | 66.47% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp-ZH | 64.71% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ChineseSimpleQA | 86.03% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HMMT 2025 | 79.58% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HumanEval+ | 94.48% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 25.81% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IFEval | 93.35% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 76.21% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MBPP+ | 82.54% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Multi-IF | 85.56% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MultiChallenge | 65.98% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA | 74.01% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SpreadsheetBench | 40.08% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-Bench | 78.79% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ZebraLogic | 96.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.8-Flash reports · 0 | ||||
| Qwen3.8-Flash reports nothing ERNIE 5.0 does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is ERNIE 5.0 minus Qwen3.8-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | ERNIE 5.0 | Qwen3.8-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1M tokens | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Max output | 66K tokens | 131K tokens | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Input price / 1M | — | $0.113 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $0.382 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $0.495 | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-02-06 | 2026-08-26 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 21 | 0 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
ERNIE 5.0 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.8-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.