Compare / head-to-head
ERNIE 5.1vsGemini 3.7 Flash
ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.7 Flash
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · 100%
Baidu · Google
ERNIE 5.1
Baidu · released 2026-05-09
text
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 66K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 2 · 2 core
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google · released 2026-08-13
textvisionaudio
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 2 only ERNIE 5.1 · 14 only Gemini 3.7 Flash| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only ERNIE 5.1 reports · 2 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1468.2 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2026 (with tools) | 99.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Gemini 3.7 Flash reports · 14 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 94.8% ↗epoch | — | — |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | not reported | 56 ↗ | — | — |
| Code Arena | not reported | 1588 ↗ | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | not reported | 65.3% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierCode 1.1 | not reported | 43.6% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 36.6% ↗epoch | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 71.6% ↗epoch | — | — |
| GDPVal-AA v2 | not reported | 1525 ↗ | — | — |
| HLE-Verified | not reported | 53.6% ↗ | — | — |
| OSWorld-2.0 | not reported | 47.9% ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 97.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 69.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
| Terminal-bench 2.1 | not reported | 85.8% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-bench 3.0 | not reported | 14.9% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is ERNIE 5.1 minus Gemini 3.7 Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1.0M tokens | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
| Max output | 66K tokens | 66K tokens | Tie |
| Input price / 1M | — | $0.75 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $3.75 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.075 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $4.5 | — |
| Modalities | text | text · vision · audio | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
| Released | 2026-05-09 | 2026-08-13 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 2 | 14 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
ERNIE 5.1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.