ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

ERNIE 5.1vsGLM-4.5-Air

ERNIE 5.1 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Both offer a 128K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
ERNIE 5.1 leads
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 128K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Baidu · Z.ai
ERNIE 5.1
Baidu · released 2026-05-09
text
Context
128K
Max out
66K
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
2 · 2 core
text
Context
128K
Max out
98K
Input /1M
$0.2
Output /1M
$1.1
Cached /1M
$0.03
Scores
2 · 2 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.5-AirΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1468.2 1383.6 +84.6ERNIE 5.1
Only ERNIE 5.1 reports · 1
AIME 2026 (with tools)99.6% not reported
Only GLM-4.5-Air reports · 1
AIME 2025not reported83.3% matharena
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is ERNIE 5.1 minus GLM-4.5-Air in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecERNIE 5.1GLM-4.5-AirEdge
Context window128K tokens128K tokensTie
Max output66K tokens98K tokensGLM-4.5-Air
Input price / 1M$0.2
Output price / 1M$1.1
Cached input / 1M$0.03
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$1.3
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2026-05-09
Cited benchmark scores22
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

ERNIE 5.1 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run ERNIE 5.1 and GLM-4.5-Air on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.