ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

ERNIE 5.1vsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

ERNIE 5.1 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
ERNIE 5.1 leads
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
both 128K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Baidu · Xiaomi MiMo
ERNIE 5.1
Baidu · released 2026-05-09
text
Context
128K
Max out
66K
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
2 · 2 core
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi MiMo
text
Context
Max out
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
1 · 1 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5-ProΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1468.2 1464.7 +3.5ERNIE 5.1
Only ERNIE 5.1 reports · 1
AIME 2026 (with tools)99.6% not reported
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro reports · 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro reports nothing ERNIE 5.1 does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is ERNIE 5.1 minus MiMo-V2.5-Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5-ProEdge
Context window128K tokens
Max output66K tokens
Input price / 1M
Output price / 1M
Cached input / 1M
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2026-05-09
Cited benchmark scores21
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

ERNIE 5.1 vs …

More matchups

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.