ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

ERNIE 5.1vsQwen3.6 27B

ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3.6 27B do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Qwen3.6 27B has the larger context window (262K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.6 27B
262K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Baidu · Qwen
ERNIE 5.1
Baidu · released 2026-05-09
text
Context
128K
Max out
66K
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
2 · 2 core
Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen · released 2026-04-21
textvision
Context
262K
Max out
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
6 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.6 27BΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only ERNIE 5.1 reports · 2
LMArena Elo1468.2 not reported
AIME 2026 (with tools)99.6% not reported
Only Qwen3.6 27B reports · 5
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported77.2%
GPQA Diamondnot reported87.8%
MMLU-Pronot reported86.2%
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported35.1% epoch
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported91.1% epoch
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is ERNIE 5.1 minus Qwen3.6 27B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecERNIE 5.1Qwen3.6 27BEdge
Context window128K tokens262K tokensQwen3.6 27B
Max output66K tokens
Input price / 1M
Output price / 1M
Cached input / 1M
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
Modalitiestexttext · visionQwen3.6 27B
Released2026-05-092026-04-21
Cited benchmark scores26
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

ERNIE 5.1 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3.6 27B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.