Compare / head-to-head
Gemini 3.6 FlashvsGPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra leads 4 of 6 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.6 Flash is 3.1x cheaper per token. GPT-5.6 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 4
GPT-5.6 Terra leads
Cheaper per token
Gemini 3.6 Flash
3.1x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.6 Terra
1.1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 94.2446%
Google · OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google · released 2026-07-21
textvisionaudio
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI · released 2026-07-09
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
6 shared · 8 only Gemini 3.6 Flash · 1 only GPT-5.6 Terra| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-5.6 Terra | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 6 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 94.1% ↗epoch | 92.9% ↗ | +1.2 pt | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 49% ↗ | 69.6% ↗ | -20.6 pt | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 22% ↗epoch | 70.7% ↗epoch | -48.7 pt | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 58.9% ↗epoch | 86% ↗epoch | -27.1 pt | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 94.2% ↗epoch | 99.7% ↗epoch | -5.5 pt | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% ↗epoch | 43.2% ↗epoch | +23 pt | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Only Gemini 3.6 Flash reports · 8 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | 96.7% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| CharXiv Reasoning (no tools) | 85.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GDM-MRCR v2 (128k average) | 91.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GDPVal-AA v2 | 1421 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MLE-Bench | 63.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 83% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro (Public) | 58.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-bench 2.1 | 78% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5.6 Terra reports · 1 | ||||
| SWE-Bench Pro | not reported | 63.4% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 3.6 Flash minus GPT-5.6 Terra in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-5.6 Terra | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.1M tokens | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Max output | 66K tokens | 128K tokens | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Input price / 1M | $0.75 ↗ | $2 ↗ | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Output price / 1M | $3.75 ↗ | $12 ↗ | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.075 ↗ | $0.2 ↗ | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $4.5 | $14 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Modalities | text · vision · audio | text · vision | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-07-09 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 14 | 8 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.6 Terra vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.