Compare / head-to-head

Gemini 3 Pro PreviewvsGemini 4 Argon

Gemini 4 Argon leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Gemini 4 Argon is 1.2x cheaper per token.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 2
Gemini 4 Argon leads
Cheaper per token
Gemini 4 Argon
1.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
—
both 1.0M tokens
Providers
Google
same provider
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Google · released 2025-11-18
textvisionaudiovideo
Context
1.0M
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$12 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
25 · 9 core
Gemini 4 Argon
Google · released 2026-09-30
textvisionvideo
Context
—
Max out
1M
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
12 · 3 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 4 ArgonΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
SAGE (Vals AI)47.6% ↗53.6% ↗-6 ptGemini 4 Argon
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)5478.16 ↗13718.16 ↗-8240Gemini 4 Argon
Only Gemini 3 Pro Preview reports · 22
SWE-bench Verified76.2% ↗not reported——
GPQA Diamond91.9% ↗not reported——
AIME 202595% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)37.5% ↗not reported——
AIME 2025 (with code execution)100% ↗not reported——
ARC-AGI-2 (ARC Prize Verified)31.1% ↗not reported——
BALROG (BALROG)58.1% ↗not reported——
CharXiv Reasoning81.4% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)31% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)17.7% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (with search and code execution)45.8% ↗not reported——
MathArena Apex23.4% ↗not reported——
MMMLU91.8% ↗not reported——
MMMU-Pro81% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)91.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)76.4% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified72.1% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)72.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Terminus-2 agent)54.2% ↗not reported——
Video-MMMU87.6% ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)69.9% ↗not reported——
τ2-bench85.4% ↗not reported——
Only Gemini 4 Argon reports · 10
LMArena Elonot reported1525.2 ↗——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported82.2% ↗——
AutomationBenchnot reported51.3% ↗——
CWE-bench v1not reported68% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported77.9% ↗——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)not reported55% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.0757 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1679.5 ↗——
LVBenchnot reported91.7% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported57.6% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 3 Pro Preview minus Gemini 4 Argon in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 4 ArgonEdge
Context window1.0M tokens——
Max output66K tokens1M tokensGemini 4 Argon
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$2 ↗Tie
Output price / 1M$12 ↗$10 ↗Gemini 4 Argon
Cached input / 1M—$0.1 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$14$12Gemini 4 Argon
Modalitiestext · vision · audio · videotext · vision · videoGemini 3 Pro Preview
Released2025-11-182026-09-30—
Cited benchmark scores2512—
Reliability

Google status

All providers →
More matchups

Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs …

More matchups

Gemini 4 Argon vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 3 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.