Compare / head-to-head

Gemini 4 ArgonvsInkling

Gemini 4 Argon leads 7 of 7 shared benchmarks. Inkling is 2.4x cheaper per token.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
7 – 0
Gemini 4 Argon leads
Cheaper per token
Inkling
2.4x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
—
unknown
Providers
2 providers
Google · Thinking Machines Lab
Gemini 4 Argon
Google · released 2026-09-30
textvisionvideo
Context
—
Max out
1M
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
12 · 3 core
Inkling
Thinking Machines Lab · released 2026-07-15
textvisionaudio
Context
1M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1 ↗
Output /1M
$4.05 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.17
Scores
39 · 12 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonInklingΔEdge
Reported by both · 7
LMArena Elo1525.2 ↗1441.4 ↗+83.8Gemini 4 Argon
APEX-Agents (Mercor)82.2% ↗33.8% ↗+48.4 ptGemini 4 Argon
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)55% ↗4.1% ↗+50.9 ptGemini 4 Argon
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0757 ↗-0.1086 ↗+0.2Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1679.5 ↗1412.6 ↗+266.9Gemini 4 Argon
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6% ↗36.6% ↗+17 ptGemini 4 Argon
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)57.6% ↗0.5% ↗+57.1 ptGemini 4 Argon
Only Gemini 4 Argon reports · 5
AutomationBench51.3% ↗not reported——
CWE-bench v168% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.177.9% ↗not reported——
LVBench91.7% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)13718.16 ↗not reported——
Only Inkling reports · 31
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported77.6% ↗——
GPQA Diamondnot reported88.3% ↗epoch run——
AIME 2026not reported97.1% ↗——
Audio MCnot reported56.6% ↗——
BrowseComp (w/ ctx management)not reported77.1% ↗——
CharXiv RQnot reported78.1% ↗——
CharXiv RQ (with python)not reported82% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported21% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported4.9% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported33.3% ↗epoch run——
Global-MMLU-Litenot reported88.7% ↗——
IFBenchnot reported79.8% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported49.4% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported71% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported72.8% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported70.1% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported73.5% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported88.4% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported78.3% ↗——
MCP Atlasnot reported76% ↗——
MMAUnot reported77.2% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported88.9% ↗epoch run——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported50% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported43.9% ↗——
SWE-bench Pro (public)not reported54.3% ↗——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)not reported25% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (best harness)not reported63.8% ↗——
Toolathlon Verifiednot reported45.5% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)not reported45.5% ↗——
VoiceBenchnot reported91.4% ↗——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)not reported32.3% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 4 Argon minus Inkling in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGemini 4 ArgonInklingEdge
Context window—1M tokens—
Max output1M tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$1 ↗Inkling
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$4.05 ↗Inkling
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗$0.17 ↗Gemini 4 Argon
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$5.05Inkling
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · vision · audioTie
Released2026-09-302026-07-15—
Cited benchmark scores1239—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Gemini 4 Argon vs …

More matchups

Inkling vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 4 Argon and Inkling on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.