Compare / head-to-head
Gemini 4 Argonvs
Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 is 4.6x cheaper per token.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
4.6x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
—
unknown
Providers
2 providers
Google · Qwen
Gemini 4 Argon
Google · released 2026-09-30
textvisionvideo
Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-31
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 12 only Gemini 4 Argon · 18 only Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Gemini 4 Argon reports · 12 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1525.2 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| APEX-Agents (Mercor) | 82.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AutomationBench | 51.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CWE-bench v1 | 68% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 77.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs) | 55% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Agent (LMArena) | 0.0757 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena WebDev (LMArena) | 1679.5 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LVBench | 91.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 53.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI) | 57.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs) | 13718.16 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 reports · 18 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 70.1% ↗epoch run | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 80.9% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME25 | not reported | 85% ↗ | — | — |
| Arena-Hard v2 | not reported | 56% ↗ | — | — |
| BFCL-v3 | not reported | 72.4% ↗ | — | — |
| Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 8% ↗epoch run | — | — |
| GPQA | not reported | 73.4% ↗ | — | — |
| HMMT25 | not reported | 71.4% ↗ | — | — |
| IFEval | not reported | 88.9% ↗ | — | — |
| LiveBench 20241125 | not reported | 76.8% ↗ | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05) | not reported | 66% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU-Redux | not reported | 91.4% ↗ | — | — |
| OJBench | not reported | 25.1% ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 70.3% ↗epoch run | — | — |
| SuperGPQA | not reported | 56.8% ↗ | — | — |
| TAU2-Airline | not reported | 58% ↗ | — | — |
| TAU2-Retail | not reported | 58.8% ↗ | — | — |
| TAU2-Telecom | not reported | 26.3% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 4 Argon minus Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | — | 262K tokens | — |
| Max output | 1M tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $2 ↗ | $0.2 ↗ | Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 |
| Output price / 1M | $10 ↗ | $2.4 ↗ | Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.1 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $12 | $2.6 | Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 |
| Modalities | text · vision · video | text | Gemini 4 Argon |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2025-07-31 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 12 | 18 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Live from /statusMore matchups
Gemini 4 Argon vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.