Compare / head-to-head
Gemma 4 26B A4BvsLlama 4 Maverick
Gemma 4 26B A4B leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Llama 4 Maverick
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Google · Meta
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google · released 2026-04-02
textvision
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 6 · 5 core
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta · released 2025-04-05
textvision
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 2 · 2 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
2 shared · 4 only Gemma 4 26B A4B · 0 only Llama 4 Maverick| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Llama 4 Maverick | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 2 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% ↗ | 69.8% ↗ | +12.5 pt | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| MMLU-Pro | 82.6% ↗ | 80.5% ↗ | +2.1 pt | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Only Gemma 4 26B A4B reports · 4 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | 88.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 8.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | 1434.5 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 77.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Llama 4 Maverick reports · 0 | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick reports nothing Gemma 4 26B A4B does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemma 4 26B A4B minus Llama 4 Maverick in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Llama 4 Maverick | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 256K tokens | 1M tokens | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Max output | — | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2025-04-05 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 6 | 2 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Llama 4 Maverick vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemma 4 26B A4B and Llama 4 Maverick on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.