Compare / head-to-head
Gemma 4 31BvsMiniMax M2.7
Gemma 4 31B leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window (256K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Gemma 4 31B leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Gemma 4 31B
256K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 100%
Google · MiniMax
Gemma 4 31B
Google · released 2026-04-02
textvision
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 6 · 5 core
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax · released 2026-03-18
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 5 only Gemma 4 31B · 0 only MiniMax M2.7| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiniMax M2.7 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1441.7 ↗ | 1404.6 ↗ | +37.1 | Gemma 4 31B |
| Only Gemma 4 31B reports · 5 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 84.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 85.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | 89.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 19.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 80% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only MiniMax M2.7 reports · 0 | ||||
| MiniMax M2.7 reports nothing Gemma 4 31B does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemma 4 31B minus MiniMax M2.7 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Gemma 4 31B | MiniMax M2.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 256K tokens | 205K tokens | Gemma 4 31B |
| Max output | — | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | $0.3 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $1.2 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.06 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $1.5 | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text | Gemma 4 31B |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 6 | 1 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Gemma 4 31B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
MiniMax M2.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemma 4 31B and MiniMax M2.7 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.