Compare / head-to-head
Gemma 4 31BvsQwen3.5-Flash
Gemma 4 31B leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.5-Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
Gemma 4 31B leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.5-Flash
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Google · Qwen
Gemma 4 31B
Google · released 2026-04-02
textvision
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 6 · 5 core
Qwen3.5-Flash
Qwen · released 2026-02-23
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
2 shared · 4 only Gemma 4 31B · 3 only Qwen3.5-Flash| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | Qwen3.5-Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 2 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 84.3% ↗ | 82.3% ↗epoch | +2 pt | Gemma 4 31B |
| LMArena Elo | 1441.7 ↗ | 1397.7 ↗ | +44 | Gemma 4 31B |
| Only Gemma 4 31B reports · 4 | ||||
| MMLU-Pro | 85.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | 89.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 19.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 80% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.5-Flash reports · 3 | ||||
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 9.5% ↗epoch | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 84.4% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 20.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemma 4 31B minus Qwen3.5-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Gemma 4 31B | Qwen3.5-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 256K tokens | 1M tokens | Qwen3.5-Flash |
| Max output | — | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | $0.029 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $0.287 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $0.316 | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-02-23 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 6 | 5 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Gemma 4 31B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.5-Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.5-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.