Compare / head-to-head
GLM-4 32B 0414 128KvsMiniMax M2.5
GLM-4 32B 0414 128K and MiniMax M2.5 do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. GLM-4 32B 0414 128K is 7.5x cheaper per token. MiniMax M2.5 has the larger context window (205K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
GLM-4 32B 0414 128K
7.5x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
MiniMax M2.5
205K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · 100%
Z.ai · MiniMax
GLM-4 32B 0414 128K
Z.ai · released 2025-04-14
text
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax · released 2026-02-12
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 0 only GLM-4 32B 0414 128K · 1 only MiniMax M2.5| Benchmark | GLM-4 32B 0414 128K | MiniMax M2.5 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only GLM-4 32B 0414 128K reports · 0 | ||||
| GLM-4 32B 0414 128K reports nothing MiniMax M2.5 does not. | ||||
| Only MiniMax M2.5 reports · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1358.9 ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4 32B 0414 128K minus MiniMax M2.5 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-4 32B 0414 128K | MiniMax M2.5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131K tokens | 205K tokens | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Max output | 16K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.1 ↗ | $0.3 ↗ | GLM-4 32B 0414 128K |
| Output price / 1M | $0.1 ↗ | $1.2 ↗ | GLM-4 32B 0414 128K |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.03 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $0.2 | $1.5 | GLM-4 32B 0414 128K |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2026-02-12 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 0 | 1 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
MiniMax M2.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4 32B 0414 128K and MiniMax M2.5 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.