ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

GLM-4.5vsPhi-4 Reasoning

GLM-4.5 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. GLM-4.5 has the larger context window (128K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
GLM-4.5 leads
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
GLM-4.5
128K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Z.ai · Microsoft
text
Context
128K
Max out
98K
Input /1M
$0.6
Output /1M
$2.2
Cached /1M
$0.11
Scores
2 · 2 core
Phi-4 Reasoning
Microsoft · released 2025-04-30
text
Context
33K
Max out
33K
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
4 · 4 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-4.5Phi-4 ReasoningΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
AIME 202593.3% matharena62.9% +30.4 ptGLM-4.5
Only GLM-4.5 reports · 1
LMArena Elo1430.2 not reported
Only Phi-4 Reasoning reports · 3
GPQA Diamondnot reported65.8%
MMLU-Pronot reported74.3%
HumanEval+not reported92.9%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.5 minus Phi-4 Reasoning in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-4.5Phi-4 ReasoningEdge
Context window128K tokens33K tokensGLM-4.5
Max output98K tokens33K tokensGLM-4.5
Input price / 1M$0.6
Output price / 1M$2.2
Cached input / 1M$0.11
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.8
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2025-04-30
Cited benchmark scores24
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.5 and Phi-4 Reasoning on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.