ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

GLM-4.6vsGLM-4.7

GLM-4.6 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Both list the same combined token price. Both offer a 200K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
GLM-4.6 leads
Cheaper per token
Tie
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
Z.ai
text
Context
200K
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0.6
Output /1M
$2.2
Cached /1M
$0.11
Scores
2 · 2 core
GLM-4.7
Z.ai · released 2025-12-22
text
Context
200K
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0.6
Output /1M
$2.2
Cached /1M
$0.11
Scores
4 · 4 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-4.6GLM-4.7ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1440.5 1435.9 +4.6GLM-4.6
Only GLM-4.6 reports · 1
AIME 202591.7% matharenanot reported
Only GLM-4.7 reports · 3
GPQA Diamondnot reported83.3% epoch
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported83.3% epoch
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported32.2% epoch
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.6 minus GLM-4.7 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-4.6GLM-4.7Edge
Context window200K tokens200K tokensTie
Max output131K tokens131K tokensTie
Input price / 1M$0.6 $0.6 Tie
Output price / 1M$2.2 $2.2 Tie
Cached input / 1M$0.11 $0.11 Tie
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.8$2.8Tie
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2025-12-22
Cited benchmark scores24
Reliability

Z.ai status

All providers
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.6 and GLM-4.7 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.