ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

GLM-4.7-FlashvsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
both 200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Z.ai · Xiaomi MiMo
text
Context
200K
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0
Output /1M
$0
Cached /1M
$0
Scores
3 · 3 core
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi MiMo
text
Context
Max out
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
1 · 1 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1352.2 1464.7 -112.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Only GLM-4.7-Flash reports · 2
GPQA Diamond60.5% epochnot reported
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)58.3% epochnot reported
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro reports · 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro reports nothing GLM-4.7-Flash does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.7-Flash minus MiMo-V2.5-Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-4.7-FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProEdge
Context window200K tokens
Max output131K tokens
Input price / 1M$0
Output price / 1M$0
Cached input / 1M$0
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released
Cited benchmark scores31
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

GLM-4.7-Flash vs …

More matchups

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.7-Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.