Compare / head-to-head
GLM-4.7-FlashvsPhi-4 Reasoning
Phi-4 Reasoning leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. GLM-4.7-Flash has the larger context window (200K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
Phi-4 Reasoning leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GLM-4.7-Flash
200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Z.ai · Microsoft
GLM-4.7-Flash
Z.ai
text
Phi-4 Reasoning
Microsoft · released 2025-04-30
text
- Context
- 33K
- Max out
- 33K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 4 · 4 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 2 only GLM-4.7-Flash · 3 only Phi-4 Reasoning| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi-4 Reasoning | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% ↗epoch | 65.8% ↗ | -5.3 pt | Phi-4 Reasoning |
| Only GLM-4.7-Flash reports · 2 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1352.2 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 58.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only Phi-4 Reasoning reports · 3 | ||||
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 74.3% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 62.9% ↗ | — | — |
| HumanEval+ | not reported | 92.9% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.7-Flash minus Phi-4 Reasoning in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi-4 Reasoning | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 33K tokens | GLM-4.7-Flash |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 33K tokens | GLM-4.7-Flash |
| Input price / 1M | $0 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $0 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $0 | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | — | 2025-04-30 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 3 | 4 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GLM-4.7-Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Phi-4 Reasoning vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.7-Flash and Phi-4 Reasoning on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.