ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

GLM-4.7-FlashXvsgpt-oss-20b

GLM-4.7-FlashX and gpt-oss-20b do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. GLM-4.7-FlashX has the larger context window (200K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
GLM-4.7-FlashX
200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · 95.2941%
Z.ai · OpenAI
text
Context
200K
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0.07
Output /1M
$0.4
Cached /1M
$0.01
Scores
0 · 0 core
gpt-oss-20b
OpenAI · released 2025-08-05
text
Context
131K
Max out
131K
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
6 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashXgpt-oss-20bΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only GLM-4.7-FlashX reports · 0
GLM-4.7-FlashX reports nothing gpt-oss-20b does not.
Only gpt-oss-20b reports · 5
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported60.7%
GPQA Diamondnot reported71.5%
AIME 2025not reported89.2% matharena
LMArena Elonot reported1287.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported65.3% epoch
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.7-FlashX minus gpt-oss-20b in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-4.7-FlashXgpt-oss-20bEdge
Context window200K tokens131K tokensGLM-4.7-FlashX
Max output131K tokens131K tokensTie
Input price / 1M$0.07
Output price / 1M$0.4
Cached input / 1M$0.01
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.47
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2025-08-05
Cited benchmark scores06
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

gpt-oss-20b vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.7-FlashX and gpt-oss-20b on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.