Compare / head-to-head
GLM-4.7vsLlama 4 Scout
GLM-4.7 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (10M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
GLM-4.7 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Llama 4 Scout
10M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Z.ai · Meta
GLM-4.7
Z.ai · released 2025-12-22
text
Llama 4 Scout
Meta · released 2025-04-05
textvision
- Context
- 10M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 2 · 2 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 3 only GLM-4.7 · 1 only Llama 4 Scout| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Llama 4 Scout | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% ↗epoch | 57.2% ↗ | +26.1 pt | GLM-4.7 |
| Only GLM-4.7 reports · 3 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1435.9 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 83.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 32.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only Llama 4 Scout reports · 1 | ||||
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 74.3% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.7 minus Llama 4 Scout in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-4.7 | Llama 4 Scout | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 10M tokens | Llama 4 Scout |
| Max output | 131K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.6 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $2.2 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.11 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $2.8 | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | Llama 4 Scout |
| Released | 2025-12-22 | 2025-04-05 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 4 | 2 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GLM-4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Llama 4 Scout vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.7 and Llama 4 Scout on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.