Compare / head-to-head
GLM-4.7vsMiniMax M2.7
GLM-4.7 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. MiniMax M2.7 is 1.9x cheaper per token. MiniMax M2.7 has the larger context window (205K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
GLM-4.7 leads
Cheaper per token
MiniMax M2.7
1.9x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
MiniMax M2.7
205K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · 100%
Z.ai · MiniMax
GLM-4.7
Z.ai · released 2025-12-22
text
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax · released 2026-03-18
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 3 only GLM-4.7 · 0 only MiniMax M2.7| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiniMax M2.7 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1435.9 ↗ | 1404.6 ↗ | +31.3 | GLM-4.7 |
| Only GLM-4.7 reports · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 83.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 32.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only MiniMax M2.7 reports · 0 | ||||
| MiniMax M2.7 reports nothing GLM-4.7 does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.7 minus MiniMax M2.7 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-4.7 | MiniMax M2.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 205K tokens | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Max output | 131K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.6 ↗ | $0.3 ↗ | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.2 ↗ | $1.2 ↗ | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.11 ↗ | $0.06 ↗ | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $2.8 | $1.5 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2025-12-22 | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 4 | 1 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GLM-4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
MiniMax M2.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.7 and MiniMax M2.7 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.