Compare / head-to-head
GLM-5.1vsLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
GLM-5.1 leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 has the larger context window (200K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
GLM-5.1 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GLM-5.1
200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Z.ai · Meta
GLM-5.1
Z.ai · released 2026-04-07
text
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta · released 2024-12-06
text
- Context
- 131K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 5 · 4 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 4 only GLM-5.1 · 1 only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 89.9% ↗epoch | 50.5% ↗ | +39.4 pt | GLM-5.1 |
| LMArena Elo | 1462.4 ↗ | 1274 ↗ | +188.4 | GLM-5.1 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 93.3% ↗epoch | 5.1% ↗epoch | +88.2 pt | GLM-5.1 |
| Only GLM-5.1 reports · 4 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | 95.8% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 36.8% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 74.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct reports · 1 | ||||
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 68.9% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-5.1 minus Llama 3.3 70B Instruct in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-5.1 | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 131K tokens | GLM-5.1 |
| Max output | 131K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $1.4 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $4.4 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.26 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $5.8 | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2026-04-07 | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 7 | 5 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GLM-5.1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-5.1 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.