Compare / head-to-head
GLM-5vsPhi-4
GLM-5 leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. GLM-5 has the larger context window (200K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
GLM-5 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GLM-5
200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Z.ai · Microsoft
Phi-4
Microsoft · released 2024-12-12
text
- Context
- 16K
- Max out
- 16K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 11 · 7 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 5 only GLM-5 · 7 only Phi-4| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Phi-4 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 87.8% ↗epoch | 56.1% ↗ | +31.7 pt | GLM-5 |
| LMArena Elo | 1446.3 ↗ | 1216.6 ↗ | +229.7 | GLM-5 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 80% ↗epoch | 13.8% ↗epoch | +66.2 pt | GLM-5 |
| Only GLM-5 reports · 5 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | 96.7% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | 96.7% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 72.1% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 56.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Phi-4 reports · 7 | ||||
| MMLU | not reported | 84.8% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 70.4% ↗ | — | — |
| HumanEval | not reported | 82.6% ↗ | — | — |
| ArenaHard | not reported | 75.4% ↗ | — | — |
| HumanEval+ | not reported | 82.8% ↗ | — | — |
| IFEval | not reported | 63% ↗ | — | — |
| MATH | not reported | 80.4% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-5 minus Phi-4 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-5 | Phi-4 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 16K tokens | GLM-5 |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 16K tokens | GLM-5 |
| Input price / 1M | $1 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $3.2 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.2 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $4.2 | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | — | 2024-12-12 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 8 | 11 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GLM-5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Phi-4 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-5 and Phi-4 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.