Compare / head-to-head

GPT-5.1-Codex MinivsGPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. GPT-5.1-Codex Mini is 26.7x cheaper per token. GPT-6 Astra has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
GPT-6 Astra leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-5.1-Codex Mini
26.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Astra
1.1M tokens
Providers
OpenAI
same provider
GPT-5.1-Codex Mini
OpenAI · released 2025-11-13
textvision
Context
400K
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.25 ↗
Output /1M
$2 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.025
Scores
1 · 1 core
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI · released 2026-09-03
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$10 ↗
Output /1M
$50 ↗
Cached /1M
$1
Scores
39 · 9 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex MiniGPT-6 AstraΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1243.6 ↗1787.7 ↗-544.1GPT-6 Astra
Only GPT-5.1-Codex Mini reports · 0
GPT-5.1-Codex Mini reports nothing GPT-6 Astra does not.
Only GPT-6 Astra reports · 32
GPQA Diamondnot reported96% ↗——
LMArena Elonot reported1477.1 ↗——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported64.7% ↗——
AutomationBench 1.0.6not reported41.4% ↗——
BALROG (BALROG)not reported68.3% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported72% ↗epoch run——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)not reported74.1% ↗——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)not reported76.2% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported97.6% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported93.7% ↗epoch run——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)not reported65.5% ↗——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)not reported80% ↗epoch run——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)not reported77.5% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported57.3% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported80.4% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported83% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported75.6% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported89.4% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported96.8% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported92.7% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.1227 ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1284.3 ↗——
MirrorCode (Epoch AI run)not reported46.7% ↗epoch run——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported84% ↗epoch run——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported100% ↗epoch run——
SAGE (Vals AI)not reported46.4% ↗——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported86.5% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported75.6% ↗epoch run——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported59.6% ↗——
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1not reported64.6% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported15514.7 ↗——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)not reported93.6% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.1-Codex Mini minus GPT-6 Astra in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-5.1-Codex MiniGPT-6 AstraEdge
Context window400K tokens1.1M tokensGPT-6 Astra
Max output128K tokens128K tokensTie
Input price / 1M$0.25 ↗$10 ↗GPT-5.1-Codex Mini
Output price / 1M$2 ↗$50 ↗GPT-5.1-Codex Mini
Cached input / 1M$0.025 ↗$1 ↗GPT-5.1-Codex Mini
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.25$60GPT-5.1-Codex Mini
Modalitiestext · visiontext · visionTie
Released2025-11-132026-09-03—
Cited benchmark scores139—
Reliability

OpenAI status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-5.1-Codex Mini vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.1-Codex Mini and GPT-6 Astra on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.