Compare / head-to-head

GPT-5.2-CodexvsGPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol leads 7 of 8 shared benchmarks. GPT-6 Sol is 1.3x cheaper per token. GPT-6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 7
GPT-6 Sol leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-6 Sol
1.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Sol
1.1M tokens
Providers
OpenAI
same provider
GPT-5.2-Codex
OpenAI · released 2025-12-18
textvision
Context
400K
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$1.75 ↗
Output /1M
$14 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.175
Scores
13 · 2 core
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.2
Scores
27 · 8 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexGPT-6 SolΔEdge
Reported by both · 8
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)49.4% ↗52.9% ↗-3.5 ptGPT-6 Sol
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)83.6% ↗81.8% ↗+1.8 ptGPT-5.2-Codex
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)78.2% ↗81.2% ↗-3 ptGPT-6 Sol
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)66.4% ↗68.6% ↗-2.2 ptGPT-6 Sol
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)73.7% ↗85.3% ↗-11.6 ptGPT-6 Sol
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)88.8% ↗96.4% ↗-7.6 ptGPT-6 Sol
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)77.7% ↗88.7% ↗-11 ptGPT-6 Sol
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1338.9 ↗1689 ↗-350.1GPT-6 Sol
Only GPT-5.2-Codex reports · 5
Cybersecurity Capture The Flag Challenges67.4% ↗not reported——
OSWorld-Verified38.2% ↗not reported——
SWE-Bench Pro56.4% ↗not reported——
SWE-Lancer IC Diamond76% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 2.064% ↗not reported——
Only GPT-6 Sol reports · 19
GPQA Diamondnot reported94.3% ↗epoch run——
LMArena Elonot reported1457.2 ↗——
Agents' Last Exam V1not reported56.4% ↗——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported54.3% ↗——
AutomationBench 1.0.6not reported33.2% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported68.8% ↗——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)not reported53.3% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported90% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported89.8% ↗epoch run——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)not reported58.3% ↗epoch run——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.0971 ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported56% ↗epoch run——
OSWorld 2.0 (offline, partial)not reported60.5% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported100% ↗epoch run——
SAGE (Vals AI)not reported44.8% ↗——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported73.1% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported60.7% ↗epoch run——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported44.4% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported14427.85 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.2-Codex minus GPT-6 Sol in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-5.2-CodexGPT-6 SolEdge
Context window400K tokens1.1M tokensGPT-6 Sol
Max output128K tokens128K tokensTie
Input price / 1M$1.75 ↗$2 ↗GPT-5.2-Codex
Output price / 1M$14 ↗$10 ↗GPT-6 Sol
Cached input / 1M$0.175 ↗$0.2 ↗GPT-5.2-Codex
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$15.75$12GPT-6 Sol
Modalitiestext · visiontext · visionTie
Released2025-12-182026-09-22—
Cited benchmark scores1327—
Reliability

OpenAI status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-5.2-Codex vs …

More matchups

GPT-6 Sol vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.2-Codex and GPT-6 Sol on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.