Compare / head-to-head
GPT-5.2vsQwen3.8-Flash
GPT-5.2 and Qwen3.8-Flash do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Qwen3.8-Flash is 31.8x cheaper per token. Qwen3.8-Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.8-Flash
31.8x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.8-Flash
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
95.2802% · —
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-5.2
OpenAI · released 2025-12-11
textvision
Qwen3.8-Flash
Qwen · released 2026-08-26
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 14 only GPT-5.2 · 0 only Qwen3.8-Flash| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Qwen3.8-Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only GPT-5.2 reports · 14 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 80% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | 100% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | 98.3% ↗matharena | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | 1412.4 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | 86.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | 52.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 31.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 67.4% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | 70.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 96.1% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 37.1% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 55.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 73.8% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.8-Flash reports · 0 | ||||
| Qwen3.8-Flash reports nothing GPT-5.2 does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.2 minus Qwen3.8-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GPT-5.2 | Qwen3.8-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 400K tokens | 1M tokens | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131K tokens | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 ↗ | $0.113 ↗ | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Output price / 1M | $14 ↗ | $0.382 ↗ | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.175 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $15.75 | $0.495 | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-08-26 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 16 | 0 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GPT-5.2 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.2 and Qwen3.8-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.