Compare / head-to-head
GPT-5vsQwen3.6 27B
GPT-5 and Qwen3.6 27B split their 4 shared benchmarks evenly. GPT-5 has the larger context window (400K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 2
even split
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5
400K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
94.9367% · —
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-5
OpenAI · released 2025-08-07
textvision
Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen · released 2026-04-21
textvision
- Context
- 262K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 6 · 5 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
4 shared · 4 only GPT-5 · 1 only Qwen3.6 27B| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Qwen3.6 27B | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 4 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.9% ↗ | 77.2% ↗ | -2.3 pt | Qwen3.6 27B |
| GPQA Diamond | 86.2% ↗epoch | 87.8% ↗ | -1.6 pt | Qwen3.6 27B |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 55.4% ↗epoch | 35.1% ↗epoch | +20.3 pt | GPT-5 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 91.4% ↗epoch | 91.1% ↗epoch | +0.3 pt | GPT-5 |
| Only GPT-5 reports · 4 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | 94.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 22% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 50.1% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 73.6% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.6 27B reports · 1 | ||||
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 86.2% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5 minus Qwen3.6 27B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GPT-5 | Qwen3.6 27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 400K tokens | 262K tokens | GPT-5 |
| Max output | 128K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $1.25 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $10 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.125 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $11.25 | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | 2026-04-21 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 9 | 6 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GPT-5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.6 27B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5 and Qwen3.6 27B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.